Editors, money and corrections
About this site and the people behind the comparison
A comparison that reads casino terms clause by clause should be just as open about itself. Here is what the site does, whom it is written for, where its income comes from and how a mistake gets fixed.
This page is about this site itself rather than about any casino. It sets out the purpose of the comparison, the readers it has in mind, the single source of money behind it and what happens when someone spots an error. If you only want the scoring rules, the page on the five checks covers them in full.
The site is written and kept up to date by a small group referred to throughout as the editors. No single author signs the pages, because every sentence about an operator is meant to rest on a clause, a register entry or a dated observation, not on a personal taste.
What the comparison is for
Crypto casinos publish long terms, and the parts that decide whether money comes back out are spread across many clauses. The comparison pulls those parts into one table: whether an identity check is written down, when it begins, whether an amount is printed, how long a player has to send papers, and whether the licensing authority lists the casino's own domain.
That is the whole job. The table does not say where to play, it does not rate the fun of a lobby, and it does not promise anything about how a casino will behave tomorrow. None of the casinos listed carries a licence issued in the Netherlands, and the comparison is information about paperwork, not an invitation to gamble with any of them.
Who the pages are written for
The main reader is someone who already knows what a wallet address is and wants to understand a casino's rules before money moves. Many visitors arrive with a specific worry: a withdrawal that stopped at a document request, a licence seal that leads nowhere, a coin sent on the wrong network. The guides are built around those moments.
A second group are readers who simply want to check a claim. For them every licence note carries its lookup date, and every clause is quoted by number, so the same page can be opened on the casino's side and compared line by line.
The money: plain facts about this site's income
There is exactly one paid element: the Vave block above the ranking. It sits outside the numbered order. Vave has no rank and no score in the text. When a reader follows that link and later becomes a customer, the site can receive a fee from the operator.
The link itself is marked as sponsored in the page code, so search engines and browser tools can see that it is a commercial link. No other casino link on the site earns money, and no other operator has paid for a mention, a position or a wording.
The ranking below the advertisement is built from the five checks and nothing else. Payment cannot add a point, and the absence of payment cannot remove one. Vave's own clauses are described in the same factual tone as everyone else's, including the parts a player may find less comfortable, such as the right in cl. 8.7 to request identity documents before any payout.
The two money tests
Most facts on the site are read from documents. Two operators were also used with money. The Vave account dates from 28 August 2026 and the TrustDice account from May 2026; both findings are summarised on the identity check guide with the limits of what one account can show. These two stay the only ones, and neither changes the score.
Reporting an error about this site
Terms change, register entries expire, and a clause number can move after an update. If you find a sentence that no longer matches what a casino or register shows, the editors want to hear about it. A useful report contains four things:
- the page and the sentence on this site that seems wrong;
- the casino and the clause number or register entry you looked at;
- the date on which you looked;
- a screenshot that shows the text together with the address bar.
Each report is compared with the source. If the source has changed, the row or sentence is rewritten with the new date, and the old reading is not kept on the page as if it still applied. If the source still says what the site says, the text stays as it is.
What the editors will not do
Some things are ruled out on principle. The site does not publish codes for bonuses, does not point to copies of casinos on other addresses, and never explains how to get past an identity check or any kind of block. It does not quote review portals or forums as sources, and it does not name casinos that fall outside the list.
Rules of the Dutch gambling market are described in one place only, the overview of Dutch gambling law. Anyone who feels gambling is taking up too much time or money can turn to OpenOverGokken at openovergokken.nl, which offers information, a self-test and a free line on 0800 24 000 22 (read on 16 September 2026); the page on keeping play within limits has more.